Warning: getimagesize(http:images/M_images/Blog_graphic.jpg): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/edrgroup/public_html/edrgroup2/libraries/sourcecoast/openGraph.php on line 420
It's Time For Transportation Planning to Account for Economic Uncertainty - Economic Development Research Group Blog

Economic Development Research Group Blog

2 minutes reading time (358 words)

It's Time For Transportation Planning to Account for Economic Uncertainty

Blog_graphic.jpg

Changes in the administration, debates in Washington, and  ongoing developments in technology, climate change and infrastructure costs make it harder than ever to undertake meaningful transportation plans, corridor studies and prioritize public investments.

 

Choosing between different mixes of long-term transportation infrastructure investments for such an uncertain future is a bit like trying to walk ashore in a rising tide. As soon as you find your path, it disappears! 

The cost of over-build on an asset or transportation system can have life cycle costs that jeopardize an agency’s ability to respond to new challenges. However the societal costs of under-build in terms of safety, congestion and environmental loss can be even more taxing. It is time for transportation planners and engineers to consider the implications of different economic trajectories when assessing future traffic volumes and investment needs. 

What if energy prices (including motor fuel) rise at triple the price currently anticipated? What if foreign trade policies or changes in exchange rates significantly alter the purchasing power of the US dollar and the sourcing of American freight? What if the economy faces another major recession, or changes in trade volumes overwhelm the capacity of US ports? Changes of this type can alter the fundamental assumptions that transportation plans hold about commuting levels, freight traffic, trip patterns, highway and inter-modal capacity and overall system performance.

New tools and data sources are being developed to enable planners to build such considerations into their forecasting and scenario planning. It is increasingly possible to consider aggressive, moderate and conservative estimates of transportation needs, as well as to create investment scenarios that balance and account for different economic possibilities. Incorporating economic possibilities into planning can transform the planning process by:

(1) Adding a level of credibility and relevance to salient economic issues

(2) Responding to tough questions from business stakeholders and elected officials

(3) Enabling plans to account for up-side and down-side risk of proposed projects

(4) Demonstrating how the rationale for prioritization may change with the economy

(5) Clarifying the appropriate overall size of transportation programs

(6) Showing ways to “Right-Size” the life-cycle preservation cost for existing assets

It’s time for a conversation about serious ways to integrate economic uncertainty into the transportation planning and decision making process. 

Beyond the Usual Suspects: Looking Past Typical Me...
Quantifying Uncertainty in Real World Decision-Mak...

Related Posts

Latest Blogposts

Twitter Feed

Resilience Economics in Action: The Example of US-101 in California https://t.co/5AUZYamrE6
RT @city_viewer: What is the role for cities in replacing the gas tax? | Smart Cities Dive https://t.co/WqSKOH7kGo #RUC #transportfinance
The Case for Forward-Looking Energy Program Evaluations https://t.co/n7uZkz7i3e
twitter 2 linkedin 2
 

Telephone: 1-617-338-6775 - This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

© 1997-2019 Economic Development Research Group, Inc; 155 Federal St. 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02110 USA