JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 62

Economic Impact of Selected Rural Interstates at the County Level

By Jack Faucett Associates and Economic Development Research Group, 2005

Does the construction of new interstate highways create economic development? Proponents of highway construction sometimes argue that new highway investment automatically brings about new jobs, while opponents sometimes argue that it brings new sprawl destroying farmland. To examine these issues, the Federal Highway Administration hired Jack Faucett Associates and Economic Development Research Group.

The firms conducted a joint study of the "economic histories" of selected interstate highways, through case studies that tracked changes occurring over time in rural and small urban areas that have become connected by new interstate highways. The study focused on "secondary interstate corridors" – i.e., those interstate highways completed after 1970 that provide regional connections for smaller communities linking to the backbone coast-to-coast routes. EDR Group's work focused on two of the case studies: Interstate 43 (I-43) in the state of Wisconsin and the portion of Interstate 81 (I-81) in the state of Pennsylvania. For those highways, staff of EDR Group developed economic development histories of the pre-construction, during the construction of interstates, and post construction time periods. This included information on socio-economic changes, economic trend changes, and the nature of economic development changes relative to the rest of the state.

The case studies by both firms found that impacts of new interstate highways varied widely along their lengths. Sometimes, there was no impact at all, undercutting both the best hopes of proponents and the worst fears of opponents. On the other hand, the case studies showed that new highways did sometimes facilitate major new industrial and warehousing activity, particularly where there were existing labor markets, connections with other highway routes and available land with zoning and sewer/water infrastructure to encourage such development.

Read the research report from the FHWA web site (links below).

Summary of Research

Pennsylvania I-81 Case Study

Wisconsin I-43 Case Study

Latest Blogposts

Twitter Feed

Dispatches from TRB's Transportation Resilience 2019 https://t.co/P3t9aH5iZL https://t.co/GF9Ar23S0R
For the Asia Development Bank, EDR Group is conducting an econ impact assessment on a new border crossing between K… https://t.co/fupjkEC46I
Dispatches from the Consortium for Scenario Planning 2019 Conference https://t.co/zG6uOehft5

Telephone: 1-617-338-6775 - This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

© 1997-2019 Economic Development Research Group, Inc; 155 Federal St. 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02110 USA